Junior Girls Tier II Volleyball STANDINGS
NORTH
| Team | GP | W | L | PTS | W% | PF | PA | DIFF | PF/G | PA/G | STR | L10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guildford ParkGUI | 8 | 8 | 0 | 16 | 1.000 | 16 | 3 | +13 | 2 | 0.38 | W8 | 8-0-0 |
| Clayton Heights "A"CLA | 8 | 7 | 1 | 14 | .875 | 15 | 3 | +12 | 1.88 | 0.38 | W3 | 7-1-0 |
| LA MathesonLA | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 | .625 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 1.38 | 0.88 | W2 | 5-3-0 |
| Fraser HeightsFRA | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | .500 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 1.13 | 1.25 | L1 | 4-4-0 |
| Kwantlen ParkKWA | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 | .375 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 1.13 | 1.25 | L3 | 3-5-0 |
| North SurreyNOR | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 | .375 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 1 | 1.38 | L1 | 3-5-0 |
| Surrey ChristianSUR | 8 | 2 | 6 | 4 | .250 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 0.75 | 1.63 | W1 | 2-6-0 |
| Johnston HeightsJOH | 8 | 2 | 5 | 4 | .250 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 0.50 | 1.50 | L2 | 2-5-0 |
| Queen ElizabethQUE | 8 | 1 | 6 | 2 | .125 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0.38 | 1.50 | L2 | 1-6-0 |
SOUTH
| Team | GP | W | L | PTS | W% | PF | PA | DIFF | PF/G | PA/G | STR | L10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Princess MargaretPRI | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 1.000 | 14 | 0 | +14 | 2 | 0 | W7 | 7-0-0 |
| Grandview HeightsGRA | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 | .714 | 11 | 4 | +7 | 1.57 | 0.57 | L1 | 5-2-0 |
| Enver CreekENV | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 | .571 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 1.14 | 1.14 | W2 | 4-3-0 |
| Panorama RidgePAN | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 | .571 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 1.43 | 1 | W2 | 4-3-0 |
| St. John Paul IIST. | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 | .429 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 1 | 1.29 | W1 | 3-4-0 |
| Clayton Heights "B"CLA | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 | .429 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 1 | 1.29 | L2 | 3-4-0 |
| Frank HurtFRA | 7 | 2 | 5 | 4 | .286 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 0.57 | 1.71 | L5 | 2-5-0 |
| TamanawisTAM | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | .000 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0.29 | 2 | L7 | 0-7-0 |
Tiebreakers
1. The team having the best ration of won/lost whole games, considering games played between the tied teams, will be ranked higher. 2. The team having the best ratio of won/lost sets, considering matches played between the tied teams, will be ranked higher. 3. The team having the best ratio of won/lost sets, considering all matches of the round, will be ranked higher. 4. The team having the best ratio of set points for/against, considering games played between the tied teams, will be ranked higher. 5. The team having the best ratio of set points for/against, considering all games played during the round, will be ranked higher. 6. Toss of coinPage Generated on May 17, 2024. Powered By:
